The second part of the ON TRIPS agreement deals with different types of intellectual property rights and their protection. The aim is to ensure that minimum standards of protection are organised in all WTO members. The starting point is the commitment of the main international agreements of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), which existed before the creation of the WTO: in addition to the basic intellectual property standards established by the TRIPS agreement, many nations have engaged in bilateral agreements to adopt a higher level of protection. This collection of standards, known as TRIPS or TRIPS-Plus, can take many forms.  Among the general objectives of these agreements are: since the TRIPS agreement came into force, it has been criticized by developing countries, scientists and non-governmental organizations. While some of this criticism is generally opposed to the WTO, many proponents of trade liberalization also view TRIPS policy as a bad policy. The effects of the concentration of WEALTH of TRIPS (money from people in developing countries for copyright and patent holders in industrialized countries) and the imposition of artificial shortages on citizens of countries that would otherwise have had weaker intellectual property laws are common bases for such criticisms. Other critics have focused on the inability of trips trips to accelerate the flow of investment and technology to low-income countries, a benefit that WTO members achieved prior to the creation of the agreement. The World Bank`s statements indicate that TRIPS have clearly not accelerated investment in low-income countries, whereas they may have done so for middle-income countries.  As part of TRIPS, long periods of patent validity were examined to determine the excessive slowdown in generic drug entry and competition. In particular, the illegality of preclinical testing or the presentation of samples to be authorized until a patent expires have been accused of encouraging the growth of certain multinationals and not producers in developing countries.
The ON TRIPS agreement is a minimum model agreement that allows members to more broadly protect intellectual property protection on demand. Members are free to determine the appropriate method of transposing the provisions of the agreement into their own legal and practical order. The standard line of support for TRIPS stems from the recognition of the current importance of the knowledge and private intellectual property (IP) economy as an important element of international trade (WTO, 2008: 39). Differences of opinion on the protection of intellectual defences and the lack of intellectual property protection are significant non-tariff barriers to trade, and TRIPS are the result of a strong multilateral framework that replaces an ineffective patchwork of IPR agreements[i] (Matthews, 2002: 10-12). That is why, for the first time, the TRIPS agreement introduced a minimum global standard for intellectual property protection, to which all WTO members must comply. These include copyright, trademarks, industrial designs, geographical indications, patents, integrated circuit designs, trade secrets and restrictions on anti-competitive contracts. Like other WTO agreements, it applies the fundamental principles of non-discrimination – the treatment of the most favoured nation (no discrimination between trading partners) and national treatment (foreigners on national territory are the same as nationals for: – intellectual property rights are the rights granted to persons/agency for their creativity/innovation. These rights generally give the author an exclusive right to use his creation for a certain period of time. The importance of intellectual property in India is well established at all levels – legal, administrative and judicial.